Özet
This study analyzes Türkiye’s “Blue Homeland” doctrine through Alfred Thayer Mahan’s principles of sea power, assessing its role in shifting Türkiye from a land-oriented tradition to a maritime orientation. It discusses the three core elements of sea power—fleet, trade, and bases—alongside Mahan’s six strategic factors: geographical position, physical conformation, extent of territory, population, national character, and governmental character. The central research questions of the study are: How has Blue Homeland shaped Türkiye’s naval strategy? And to what extent has it placed the country on the path to becoming a sea power? The study argues that the Blue Homeland doctrine has catalyzed a strategic reorientation by expanding naval capabilities, reinforcing regional security roles, and advancing offshore energy exploration activities. It highlights the impact of indigenous defense programs, alongside overseas basing and forward-defense initiatives, as evidence of Türkiye’s emerging maritime identity. However, the process also has some shortcomings: institutional fragmentation, a lack of codified maritime strategy, economic constraints, and the persistence of a land-centric outlook. From a Mahanian perspective, the Blue Homeland doctrine has nudged Türkiye toward a regional sea power by prioritizing naval modernization, securing maritime trade routes, and extending operational reach. However, without sustained investment in fleet capacity, overseas bases, and cultural embrace of the sea across society, ambitions risk outpacing capabilities. The article concludes that Blue Homeland represents a pivotal first step in Türkiye’s maritime transformation; however, its long-term success depends on whether the strategic vision can be translated into enduring naval strength and influence.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sea Power, Naval Strategy, Maritime Security, Blue Homeland, Türkiye
Bu makale 7 kez okundu